Free or non-free?
There has been an interesting debate going on over the past week or so that gets to the heart of one of the deep-seated conflicts within the web-startup community: namely, whether apps and services are better when they are free or when users pay for them. Dalton Caldwell, the founder of Imeem, kicked things off by saying he is going to try to create a for-pay version of Twitter, and others cheered him on by saying that an advertising-based approach makes a lot of services less appealing than they could be. Venture capitalist Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures, however, argued that free and ad-supported is actually the best model for consumer services that want to achieve a broad reach. So who is right?
0 ANSWER
No answers available. You can post your answer below.
POST ANSWER
Sorry! You need to login first to post answer.
Theory and practice in action |
| By sonic0002 |
RECENT
- ► GPT-5 solved the math problems on ErdosProblems.com by merely finding existing answers online, not developing new algorithms
- ► Does your company allow code agent such as Cursor?
- ► What do we do if a workaholic superstar joins our department?
- ► What tech related movies or shows have you watched?
- ► What bad comments do people have on GoLang?
- ► Are you using Cursor or Windsurf?
- ► Will AI Replace Programmers?
- ► What Is Your AI Learning Story?
- ► What Chrome extensions do you find useful for programmers?
- ► What does your personal desk look like?