Should effect of software patents be limited?
Patents threaten every software developer, and the patent wars we have long feared have broken out. Software developers and software users – which in our society, is most people – need software to be free of patents. We don't want to face the situation when someday some company comes to you and say that your software uses their patent. Should we limit the effect of software patents?
I am agree with limiting the effect of software patents. Sometimes it's very easy for us to use some designs or components without knowing that they are patented. It may bring to us some unknown potential affections when our apps are online. But instead of limiting effect of software patent, I prefer to constrain what can be patented in software. Some commonly used designs may not be patented.
Sorry! You need to login first to post answer.
A : "I have written over 100,000 lines of code in primary school" B : "Oh. So cool. Then what's after?" A : "Then I learnt how to write loop statements"
- ► What's your opinion about Alibaba mooncake incident?
- ► Should a CTO write code?
- ► What does it feel to have a programmer dad or mom?
- ► Should we be worried about the win of AlphaGo?
- ► Why doesn't IBM file legal brief in support of Apple?
- ► What are the big Internet events in 2015?
- ► Will Elon Musk get into drone business?
- ► What does your work cubicle look like?
- ► What are you most afraid of as a programmer?
- ► Is Apple dead in innovation?